|
|
 FAQ
 Search
 Memberlist
 Usergroups
 Register
 Profile
 Private messages
 Log in
|
|
| Author |
Message |
Neil
Guest
|
 Posted: Tue Jul 06, 2004 5:31 pm Post subject: Re: OT |
 |
|
"Consultant" <consultant_mcngp@yahoo.com> wrote in news:eS6B4D2YEHA.2388
@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl:
| Quote: | miko miko nurse, you tool.
|
'scuse me...forgot the fate of the free world hung in the balance...
(And I'm still recovering from weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee)
--
Neil MCNGP #30
"you'd do what, to who, for how many biscuits?" |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
billyw
Guest
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 06, 2004 6:30 pm Post subject: Re: OT |
|
|
it wasn't so much the state as all the businesses in there...
arise again east india company...
"Jtyc" <jtyc_mcngp@spamblockerbitch!@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:OALD3t2YEHA.1652@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
| Quote: | so.. i'm sorry.. can i have delaware now?
Sure.
I doubt that anyone would miss it.
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
billyw
Guest
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 06, 2004 6:30 pm Post subject: Re: OT |
|
|
| Quote: | You would have to deal with all of the idiots who spend all of their time
sueing people for no good reason
|
aren't they commonly known as americans?
or liverpudlians |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Neil
Guest
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 06, 2004 7:30 pm Post subject: Re: OT |
|
|
"Jtyc" <jtyc_mcngp@spamblockerbitch!@yahoo.com> wrote in
news:eicgJf4YEHA.1656@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl:
| Quote: | it wasn't so much the state as all the businesses in there...
arise again east india company...
We were working on that but you Eurotrash sued them for $600 million.
The East Microsoft Company.
|
AND......you paid...
guilty as...well just plain guilty.
--
Neil MCNGP #30
"you'd do what, to who, for how many biscuits?" |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Jtyc
Guest
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 06, 2004 7:30 pm Post subject: Re: OT |
|
|
| Quote: | it wasn't so much the state as all the businesses in there...
arise again east india company...
|
We were working on that but you Eurotrash sued them for $600 million.
The East Microsoft Company. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Jtyc
Guest
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 06, 2004 8:30 pm Post subject: Re: OT |
|
|
| Quote: | anyway the east india company had it's on army.. so no french or belgian
would dare ask for money
|
We are the army for Microsoft.
obviously you didn't read your agreement when you got your MCSE... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
billyw
Guest
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 06, 2004 8:30 pm Post subject: Re: OT |
|
|
only cause bush came to power.. else the sherman act would have done for
them in the US as well..
anyway the east india company had it's on army.. so no french or belgian
would dare ask for money
"Jtyc" <jtyc_mcngp@spamblockerbitch!@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:eicgJf4YEHA.1656@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
| Quote: | it wasn't so much the state as all the businesses in there...
arise again east india company...
We were working on that but you Eurotrash sued them for $600 million.
The East Microsoft Company.
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
Jtyc
Guest
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 06, 2004 9:30 pm Post subject: Re: OT |
|
|
| Quote: | what am i meant to do.. jag them in the eye with my pin and slash them
with
my card....
|
Your pin is a communicator and your card will allow you access to the armory
in your designated area. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
billyw
Guest
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 06, 2004 9:30 pm Post subject: Re: OT |
|
|
what am i meant to do.. jag them in the eye with my pin and slash them with
my card....
"Jtyc" <jtyc_mcngp@spamblockerbitch!@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:eeet0N5YEHA.2844@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
| Quote: | anyway the east india company had it's on army.. so no french or belgian
would dare ask for money
We are the army for Microsoft.
obviously you didn't read your agreement when you got your MCSE...
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
~~~ The Obelisk [7.13.86.
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu Sep 14, 2006 2:33 am Post subject: Re: OT |
|
|
"LoopBack" <mr.mork@gmail.com> wrote in message
| Quote: | TGP really needs to sort out his html, 11 validation errors!
|
HTML validation is dumb. 99.999999999% of the internet is constructed with
invalid HTML.
All that matters is that the pages render. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
~~~ Turkey Baster Boy [28
Guest
|
| Posted: Sat Sep 16, 2006 3:06 am Post subject: Re: OT |
|
|
"Thor" <gorm_b@hotmail.com> wrote
| Quote: | D@mn , I'm beginning to like you, I disliked you so good. Still, I
disagree
with you.
|
I liked it better when you simply disliked me. I was looking forward to
having an arch-nemesis. I never get to have an arch-nemesis. I was all set
up to have an arch-nemesis Gorm, and to chronicle the epic struggle between
the good, the gorm, and the ugly.
I'll have to work harder at being worthy of an arch-nemesis. I can't seem to
pick. Maybe I'll just become an enemy to humankind, but that seems like a
lot of effort.
*Sigh*. I'm a disappointment even to myself.
| Quote: | I remember my old pascal programs stopped working since the CPU was too
fast!
|
Funny, it always seems like whatever I want to do on the computer, it's too
slow, because there's too much garbage.
| Quote: | I think HTML will be viewed much like machine code in the future, or maybe
compared to .COM-files. There is just no use for coding in the bytecodes
when you have high-level languages, with the COM-files you just have to
many
restrictions.
|
I don't see HTML as 'code', but more as 'markup', because it's supposed to
be a way to create and lay out documents. Really, it's become cludgy
mind-butter with all of the dynamic this and scripting that.
DUMB. Digitally Understood Markup Blocks. see, there's always the desire to
separate content from layout, to separate server side processing from
markup, etc. The goal being to eliminate the replication of effort required
to express a thought and have it accessible on multiple platforms or
devices. Of course, there's no such answer, and it's lame anyway.
| Quote: |
There would
have to be a seamless migration path, and this would have to be a
completely
clean break from HTML entirely. Of course, if history is a guide, what
is
most likely to happen is that they will continue to screw up HTML and
branch
off of it until they have to come up with something new, the something
new
they come up with will be incomplete and problematic, and they'll
basically
start over, and they'll disagree on standards, and the cycle will
continue
forever.
I must agree that this is a possible scenario, too. But I think money will
make a way.
You did have a good idea on ISAPI filters to correct the documents, but
that's not going to be available on all varieties of servers, and
really,
if
the browser is built properly, that shouldn't be necessary. Also, the
server
really needs to be able to handle traffic, and if every document request
is
filtered to ensure that it is compliant, well, there's going to be a lot
of
wasted cpu cycles in a place where those cpu cycles will be needed most.
The
key in keeping the architecture going is so that the browser does the
work
of ensuring rendering occurs, and the server is freed up to spit out
files.
CPU-cycles are not the problem, that's why you have native gzip built in
when you use IE and IIS.
|
Well, the goal there is to save bandwidth on the network infrastructure.
CPU cycles are kinda fundamental to every other part of the architecture.
| Quote: | You can't teach an old Cyborg new violin songs.
www.live.com
|
Pointing me to a microsoft site is only going to annoy me. I see them
loading up my computer with things I don't really want, which makes it
slower and more annoying. I don't see them coming up with something that
gives me what I really want.
| Quote: |
Regardless, I stick by my original proclamation, 99.99999% of the
internet
is written using invalid html, and any future browser that is going to
be
used, is going to have to make an effort to put up with that, because
99.99999% of the people that made that invalid HTML aren't going to
rewrite
it, and they will complain about, or simply not use, tools that
invalidate
the internet.
I agree that some will survive, but I don't see why my ISP can't convert
it
on the rooter.
|
I just think that the server should ship documents, and that's it. I don't
want my code to be muddled in transit.
Microcephalic S. Bob |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Thor
Guest
|
| Posted: Sun Sep 17, 2006 2:05 pm Post subject: Re: OT |
|
|
<@> wrote in message news:eTSDx8d2GHA.1040@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
| Quote: |
"Thor" <gorm_b@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:OeQTi7c2GHA.5048@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
"~~~ Turkey Baster Boy [28:06:42:12] ~~~"
http://www.planetoftheheads.com
wrote in message news:O$T6yKR2GHA.328@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
"Thor" <gorm_b@hotmail.com> wrote
D@mn , I'm beginning to like you, I disliked you so good. Still, I
disagree
with you.
I liked it better when you simply disliked me. I was looking forward to
having an arch-nemesis. I never get to have an arch-nemesis. I was all
set
up to have an arch-nemesis Gorm, and to chronicle the epic struggle
between
the good, the gorm, and the ugly.
you being the good, of course...
No. Me being the uninvolved and disinterested.
I probably could have an arch-nemesis, if I were genuinely interested in
some purpose or belief. I just don't care.
Both sides are right, anyway, people just argue with me about the part I
can't articulate in the time they allot me before they respond, or they
assume the side opposite to what I represent because all they really want
to
do is disagree and be right about it. We're all wrong, and that's
exemplified far too frequently.
Funny, it always seems like whatever I want to do on the computer, it's
too
slow, because there's too much garbage.
yup, computer getting faster and faster, programs more and more
annoyingly
slow..
I considered changing to Windows CE on my workstation, but no compilers.
Office has the right ammount of functionality here, I think.
I think HTML will be viewed much like machine code in the future, or
maybe
compared to .COM-files. There is just no use for coding in the
bytecodes
when you have high-level languages, with the COM-files you just have
to
many
restrictions.
I don't see HTML as 'code', but more as 'markup', because it's supposed
to
be a way to create and lay out documents. Really, it's become cludgy
mind-butter with all of the dynamic this and scripting that.
sorry, it's code. language is changing in a stupid way.
It's both, but either way, it's ridiculous and doesn't work, which was my
point to begin with.
|
ok, B.O.B, here goes:
And. But all things are not always are not always are not always are not
always are not always are not always are not always are not always are not
always are not always are not always are not always are not always are not
always are not always are not always are not always are not always are not
always are not always are not always are not always are not always are not
always are not always are not always are not always are not always are not
always are not always are not always are not always are not always are not
always you need to know you learned from Dr Richard s Wallace.
53 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
~~~ The F-Word [28:06:42:
Guest
|
| Posted: Mon Sep 18, 2006 1:37 am Post subject: Re: OT |
|
|
No.
Richard Wallace is a ***.
"Thor" <gorm_b@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:%23Ogz1hj2GHA.480@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
| Quote: | ok, B.O.B, here goes:
And. But all things are not always are not always are not always are not
always are not always are not always are not always are not always are not
always are not always are not always are not always are not always are not
always are not always are not always are not always are not always are not
always are not always are not always are not always are not always are not
always are not always are not always are not always are not always are not
always are not always are not always are not always are not always are not
always you need to know you learned from Dr Richard s Wallace.
53
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
