|
|
 FAQ
 Search
 Memberlist
 Usergroups
 Register
 Profile
 Private messages
 Log in
|
|
| Author |
Message |
Neil
Guest
|
 Posted: Wed Jul 14, 2004 5:30 pm Post subject: legally changed |
 |
|
"Brat®" <likeIwouldtellyou@inyourdreams.com> wrote in news:Z1dJc.73787
$Np3.3596668@ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca:
| Quote: | "Neil" <neilmcse@nospamforyou.com> wrote in message
news:Xns95267C452C17Fneilmcsehotmailcom@207.46.248.16...
TechGeekPro <%username%@gmail.com> wrote in
news:Xns95267C1962AD4TechGeekPro@216.196.97.142:
Shut up! Shut up! Shut up! Shut up! You shut up you!
my work here is done...
:)
*prints out above statement to be used in a court of law*
"But your honor, he said he was done!!!"
|
as previously indicated my work in that thread was indeed done. I have
however created this new thread to allow me to respond to the further
comments made without incurring legal ramifacations.
too bad Sue/jtyc
--
Neil MCNGP #30
"you'd do what, to who, for how many biscuits?"
Minutus cantorum, minutus balorum, minutus carborata descendum pantorum. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
Ken Briscoe
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed Jul 14, 2004 5:30 pm Post subject: Re: legally changed |
|
|
"JaR" <plentespam@nospamsofthome.net> wrote in message
news:e6xVdTcaEHA.3012@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
| Quote: | Neil wrote:
Shut up! Shut up! Shut up! Shut up! You shut up you!
my work here is done...
:)
*prints out above statement to be used in a court of law*
"But your honor, he said he was done!!!"
as previously indicated my work in that thread was indeed done. I have
however created this new thread to allow me to respond to the further
comments made without incurring legal ramifacations.
too bad Sue/jtyc
Sorry.
According to precedent[1] a previously initiated off-topic thread may
not be restarted in a new thread. The new off-topic being the same as
the prior off-topic renders the off-topic of the second part on-topic to
the off-topic of the first part. Ergo, the second off-topic thread will
be deemed a continuation of the first off-topic, and therefore legally a
part of the prior off-topic.
|
I'm not so sure I can comment on this, simply because my brain is leaking
out my ears.
--
KB - MCNGP "silent thug" #26
first initial last name AT hotmail DOT com |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Jtyc
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed Jul 14, 2004 5:31 pm Post subject: Re: legally changed |
|
|
| whew... I'm sure glad I didn't decide to hold my breath. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Brat®
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed Jul 14, 2004 5:31 pm Post subject: Re: legally changed |
|
|
woooohoooooo
--
Sue MCNGP #69
Proud member since April 8, 2002
"JaR" <plentespam@nospamsofthome.net> wrote in message
news:e6xVdTcaEHA.3012@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
| Quote: | Neil wrote:
Shut up! Shut up! Shut up! Shut up! You shut up you!
my work here is done...
:)
*prints out above statement to be used in a court of law*
"But your honor, he said he was done!!!"
as previously indicated my work in that thread was indeed done. I have
however created this new thread to allow me to respond to the further
comments made without incurring legal ramifacations.
too bad Sue/jtyc
Sorry.
According to precedent[1] a previously initiated off-topic thread may
not be restarted in a new thread. The new off-topic being the same as
the prior off-topic renders the off-topic of the second part on-topic to
the off-topic of the first part. Ergo, the second off-topic thread will
be deemed a continuation of the first off-topic, and therefore legally a
part of the prior off-topic.
[1] MCNGP vs Paisley Skye et al. MCNGP vs Don. MCNGP vs Eddiepox
JaR
IANAL Thug |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Neil
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed Jul 14, 2004 5:31 pm Post subject: Re: legally changed |
|
|
JaR <plentespam@nospamsofthome.net> wrote in
news:e6xVdTcaEHA.3012@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl:
| Quote: | Neil wrote:
Shut up! Shut up! Shut up! Shut up! You shut up you!
my work here is done...
:)
*prints out above statement to be used in a court of law*
"But your honor, he said he was done!!!"
as previously indicated my work in that thread was indeed done. I
have however created this new thread to allow me to respond to the
further comments made without incurring legal ramifacations.
too bad Sue/jtyc
Sorry.
According to precedent[1] a previously initiated off-topic thread may
not be restarted in a new thread. The new off-topic being the same as
the prior off-topic renders the off-topic of the second part on-topic
to the off-topic of the first part. Ergo, the second off-topic thread
will be deemed a continuation of the first off-topic, and therefore
legally a part of the prior off-topic.
[1] MCNGP vs Paisley Skye et al. MCNGP vs Don. MCNGP vs Eddiepox
JaR
IANAL Thug
|
MAYBE IN THE U.S.!!!
up here in Canada I will fight that one all the way to the supreme
court....
--
Neil MCNGP #30
"you'd do what, to who, for how many biscuits?"
Minutus cantorum, minutus balorum, minutus carborata descendum pantorum. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
JaR
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed Jul 14, 2004 5:31 pm Post subject: Re: legally changed |
|
|
Neil wrote:
| Quote: | Shut up! Shut up! Shut up! Shut up! You shut up you!
my work here is done...
:)
*prints out above statement to be used in a court of law*
"But your honor, he said he was done!!!"
as previously indicated my work in that thread was indeed done. I have
however created this new thread to allow me to respond to the further
comments made without incurring legal ramifacations.
too bad Sue/jtyc
|
Sorry.
According to precedent[1] a previously initiated off-topic thread may
not be restarted in a new thread. The new off-topic being the same as
the prior off-topic renders the off-topic of the second part on-topic to
the off-topic of the first part. Ergo, the second off-topic thread will
be deemed a continuation of the first off-topic, and therefore legally a
part of the prior off-topic.
[1] MCNGP vs Paisley Skye et al. MCNGP vs Don. MCNGP vs Eddiepox
JaR
IANAL Thug |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Jtyc
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed Jul 14, 2004 6:30 pm Post subject: Re: legally changed |
|
|
| Quote: | up here in Canada I will fight that one all the way to the supreme
court....
|
Just like a Canadian... run home to your lawyer.
--
Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum viditur. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
JaR
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed Jul 14, 2004 6:30 pm Post subject: Re: legally changed |
|
|
Neil wrote:
| Quote: |
MAYBE IN THE U.S.!!!
up here in Canada I will fight that one all the way to the supreme
court....
|
Sorry again, but the law of the MCNGP takes precedence over mere
national legal mumbo-jumbo.
You can run but you can't hide.
JaR |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Neil
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed Jul 14, 2004 6:30 pm Post subject: Re: legally changed |
|
|
JaR <plentespam@nospamsofthome.net> wrote in news:eXfLtqcaEHA.3752
@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl:
| Quote: | You can run but you can't hide.
|
yes I can
--
Neil MCNGP #30
"you'd do what, to who, for how many biscuits?"
Minutus cantorum, minutus balorum, minutus carborata descendum pantorum. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Jtyc
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed Jul 14, 2004 6:31 pm Post subject: Re: legally changed |
|
|
| Quote: | I thought you were my lawyer...
|
What's with the name calling? Why do you have to make it personal?
--
Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum viditur. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
molsonexpert
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed Jul 14, 2004 6:31 pm Post subject: Re: legally changed |
|
|
"Jtyc" <jtyc_mcngp@spamblockerbitch!@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:OiwRVqcaEHA.3804@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
| Quote: | up here in Canada I will fight that one all the way to the supreme
court....
Just like a Canadian... run home to your lawyer.
--
Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum viditur.
Canadian thing? As opposed to Americans, who like to avoid responsibility |
altogether and call their lawyer ("I didn't know the coffee was hot, so
I'll see how much cash I can suck out of Ronnie McDonald").
"The first thing we do, let's kill of the lawyers" - Bill S.
Steve |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Jtyc
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed Jul 14, 2004 6:31 pm Post subject: Re: legally changed |
|
|
| Quote: | Canadian thing? As opposed to Americans, who like to avoid responsibility
altogether and call their lawyer ("I didn't know the coffee was hot, so
I'll see how much cash I can suck out of Ronnie McDonald").
|
heh... you don't want to start that argument around these people...
--
Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum viditur. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Frisbee®
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed Jul 14, 2004 6:31 pm Post subject: Re: legally changed |
|
|
molsonexpert wrote:
| Quote: | "Jtyc" <jtyc_mcngp@spamblockerbitch!@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:OiwRVqcaEHA.3804@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
up here in Canada I will fight that one all the way to the supreme
court....
Just like a Canadian... run home to your lawyer.
Canadian thing? As opposed to Americans, who like to avoid
responsibility altogether and call their lawyer ("I didn't know the
coffee was hot, so I'll see how much cash I can suck out of Ronnie
McDonald").
|
Do NOT get me started on Stella.
I would guess that Jtyc shares my sentiment, although I'm sure he agrees
with you.
Read up on the case before you make such blatant statements.
--
Fris "Here comes the Stella Thread" bee®, MCNGP #13
The MCNGP Team - We're here to help!
http://www.mcngp.tk
Certaholics
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/certaholics |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Ken Briscoe
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed Jul 14, 2004 6:31 pm Post subject: Re: legally changed |
|
|
"Frisbee®" <billLASTINIT@dasi-software.com> wrote in message
news:uvPn55caEHA.2544@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
| Quote: |
Do NOT get me started on Stella.
|
http://www.stellaawards.com/stella.html
--
KB - MCNGP "silent thug" #26
first initial last name AT hotmail DOT com |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
Frisbee®
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed Jul 14, 2004 6:31 pm Post subject: Re: legally changed |
|
|
Jtyc wrote:
| Quote: | Canadian thing? As opposed to Americans, who like to avoid
responsibility altogether and call their lawyer ("I didn't know the
coffee was hot, so I'll see how much cash I can suck out of Ronnie
McDonald").
heh... you don't want to start that argument around these people...
|
Shaddup and drink yer damned Starbucks |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
