|
|
 FAQ
 Search
 Memberlist
 Usergroups
 Register
 Profile
 Private messages
 Log in
|
|
| Author |
Message |
Northen Pike Face
Guest
|
 Posted: Thu Jul 15, 2004 7:31 pm Post subject: SUS/SMS |
 |
|
My protoge claims that no one on the planet is using SMS
2003/SUS combo method to do Windows Updates across the
enterprise.
Can anyone here attest?
NPF |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
fygar
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu Jul 15, 2004 8:31 pm Post subject: Re: SUS/SMS |
|
|
On Thu, 15 Jul 2004 12:25:32 -0700, "Northen Pike Face"
<anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote:
| Quote: | My protoge claims that no one on the planet is using SMS
2003/SUS combo method to do Windows Updates across the
enterprise.
Can anyone here attest?
NPF
|
Works fine here ...
If he is your protege, you should tell him to get back in his place
and listen to his master.
http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?book=Dictionary&va=protege
.....butch() |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Rick
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu Jul 15, 2004 8:31 pm Post subject: Re: SUS/SMS |
|
|
NO sms here but I do have 2003 server with sus running on it.
Rick
"Consultant" <consultant_mcngp@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:uDhRiMqaEHA.1652@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
| Quote: | i believe that is a very bold statement and he should be flogged
"Northen Pike Face" <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:2e4b801c46aa1$7edd5590$a301280a@phx.gbl...
My protoge claims that no one on the planet is using SMS
2003/SUS combo method to do Windows Updates across the
enterprise.
Can anyone here attest?
NPF
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Consultant
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu Jul 15, 2004 8:31 pm Post subject: Re: SUS/SMS |
|
|
i believe that is a very bold statement and he should be flogged
"Northen Pike Face" <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:2e4b801c46aa1$7edd5590$a301280a@phx.gbl...
| Quote: | My protoge claims that no one on the planet is using SMS
2003/SUS combo method to do Windows Updates across the
enterprise.
Can anyone here attest?
NPF |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Pike Face
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu Jul 15, 2004 10:30 pm Post subject: Re: SUS/SMS |
|
|
Fygar lipps,
Please please describe how you have made this work.
I will send you amazon $ gift certs for meaty details, or
a big piece of meat.
Thx
| Quote: | -----Original Message-----
On Thu, 15 Jul 2004 12:25:32 -0700, "Northen Pike Face"
anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote:
My protoge claims that no one on the planet is using SMS
2003/SUS combo method to do Windows Updates across the
enterprise.
Can anyone here attest?
NPF
Works fine here ...
If he is your protege, you should tell him to get back in
his place
and listen to his master.
http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?
book=Dictionary&va=protege
.....butch()
.
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Consultant
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu Jul 15, 2004 10:30 pm Post subject: Re: SUS/SMS |
|
|
that's disgusting. this is not an adult chat room
"Pike Face" <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:2dcef01c46ab4$79f678f0$a401280a@phx.gbl...
| Quote: | Fygar lipps,
Please please describe how you have made this work.
I will send you amazon $ gift certs for meaty details, or
a big piece of meat.
Thx
-----Original Message-----
On Thu, 15 Jul 2004 12:25:32 -0700, "Northen Pike Face"
anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote:
My protoge claims that no one on the planet is using SMS
2003/SUS combo method to do Windows Updates across the
enterprise.
Can anyone here attest?
NPF
Works fine here ...
If he is your protege, you should tell him to get back in
his place
and listen to his master.
http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?
book=Dictionary&va=protege
.....butch()
.
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Kat
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Jul 16, 2004 1:31 am Post subject: Re: SUS/SMS |
|
|
Goat or cow?
Kat
"Pike Face" <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:2dcef01c46ab4$79f678f0$a401280a@phx.gbl...
| Quote: | Fygar lipps,
Please please describe how you have made this work.
I will send you amazon $ gift certs for meaty details, or
a big piece of meat.
Thx
-----Original Message-----
On Thu, 15 Jul 2004 12:25:32 -0700, "Northen Pike Face"
anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote:
My protoge claims that no one on the planet is using SMS
2003/SUS combo method to do Windows Updates across the
enterprise.
Can anyone here attest?
NPF
Works fine here ...
If he is your protege, you should tell him to get back in
his place
and listen to his master.
http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?
book=Dictionary&va=protege
.....butch()
.
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
Barracuda Lips
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Jul 16, 2004 5:30 am Post subject: Re: SUS/SMS |
|
|
Ok, then i guess no one can answer my question.
I guess the young lad is right, and therefore we need to
spend all night patching machines even though we have a
$100,000 SMS 2003 enterprise deployed by an over priced
consulting company.
Effing waste of $.
| Quote: | -----Original Message-----
NO sms here but I do have 2003 server with sus running on
it.
Rick
"Consultant" <consultant_mcngp@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:uDhRiMqaEHA.1652@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
i believe that is a very bold statement and he should
be flogged
"Northen Pike Face"
anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:2e4b801c46aa1$7edd5590$a301280a@phx.gbl...
My protoge claims that no one on the planet is using
SMS
2003/SUS combo method to do Windows Updates across the
enterprise.
Can anyone here attest?
NPF
.
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Kat
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Jul 16, 2004 5:30 am Post subject: Re: SUS/SMS |
|
|
They make a good stir fry though.
kat
"TechGeekPro" <%username%@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:Xns952852B9F76TechGeekPro@216.196.97.142...
| Quote: | On Jul 15, 2004 "Kat" blathered:
Goat or cow?
Like I told Frisbee, if it involves a goat, count me out.
--
TechGeekPro
MCNGP #36, MCSA, A+, Net+, i-Net+
"Not only am I certified, I'm certifiable!" |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Kat
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Jul 16, 2004 5:30 am Post subject: Re: SUS/SMS |
|
|
I don't see what the problem is, truth be told. Is there any particular
reason you think it will not work?
I did a simple google search, came up with several useful pages about the
two together, none of which specified any problems. I think you'r "problem"
is your "protege".
Is he a friend of Wong's?
Kat
"Barracuda Lips" <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:2e7cd01c46af3$51e9a3c0$a301280a@phx.gbl...
| Quote: | Ok, then i guess no one can answer my question.
I guess the young lad is right, and therefore we need to
spend all night patching machines even though we have a
$100,000 SMS 2003 enterprise deployed by an over priced
consulting company.
Effing waste of $.
-----Original Message-----
NO sms here but I do have 2003 server with sus running on
it.
Rick
"Consultant" <consultant_mcngp@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:uDhRiMqaEHA.1652@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
i believe that is a very bold statement and he should
be flogged
"Northen Pike Face"
anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:2e4b801c46aa1$7edd5590$a301280a@phx.gbl...
My protoge claims that no one on the planet is using
SMS
2003/SUS combo method to do Windows Updates across the
enterprise.
Can anyone here attest?
NPF
.
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
TechGeekPro
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Jul 16, 2004 5:30 am Post subject: Re: SUS/SMS |
|
|
On Jul 15, 2004 "Kat" blathered:
Like I told Frisbee, if it involves a goat, count me out.
--
TechGeekPro
MCNGP #36, MCSA, A+, Net+, i-Net+
"Not only am I certified, I'm certifiable!" |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Rokkit Balls
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Jul 16, 2004 6:31 am Post subject: Re: SUS/SMS |
|
|
I did too Kat.
All you get is SUS -VS- SMS propaganda.
NOTHING about the integration of the two.
Well, yeah, mish mash about SUS Feature Pack.
But I see no evidence of anyone using the combo
successfully to patch 98, 2000, XP, 2003 machines.
Maybe its late and I'm an idiot.
Maybe my dog will scratch my eyes out.
| Quote: | -----Original Message-----
I don't see what the problem is, truth be told. Is there
any particular
reason you think it will not work?
I did a simple google search, came up with several useful
pages about the
two together, none of which specified any problems. I
think you'r "problem"
is your "protege".
Is he a friend of Wong's?
Kat
"Barracuda Lips" <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com
wrote in message
news:2e7cd01c46af3$51e9a3c0$a301280a@phx.gbl...
Ok, then i guess no one can answer my question.
I guess the young lad is right, and therefore we need to
spend all night patching machines even though we have a
$100,000 SMS 2003 enterprise deployed by an over priced
consulting company.
Effing waste of $.
-----Original Message-----
NO sms here but I do have 2003 server with sus running
on
it.
Rick
"Consultant" <consultant_mcngp@yahoo.com> wrote in
message
news:uDhRiMqaEHA.1652@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
i believe that is a very bold statement and he should
be flogged
"Northen Pike Face"
anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:2e4b801c46aa1$7edd5590$a301280a@phx.gbl...
My protoge claims that no one on the planet is
using
SMS
2003/SUS combo method to do Windows Updates across
the
enterprise.
Can anyone here attest?
NPF
.
.
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
catwalker63
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Jul 16, 2004 7:30 am Post subject: Re: SUS/SMS |
|
|
http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserversystem/sus/suschoosing.mspx
From the above link I am gathering they are independent and that sms does
all that sus does and more.
--
Kelley
aka catwalker
IT Professional, MCP
"Rokkit Balls" <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:2e80b01c46afb$94b2ae10$a301280a@phx.gbl...
| Quote: | I did too Kat.
All you get is SUS -VS- SMS propaganda.
NOTHING about the integration of the two.
Well, yeah, mish mash about SUS Feature Pack.
But I see no evidence of anyone using the combo
successfully to patch 98, 2000, XP, 2003 machines.
Maybe its late and I'm an idiot.
Maybe my dog will scratch my eyes out.
-----Original Message-----
I don't see what the problem is, truth be told. Is there
any particular
reason you think it will not work?
I did a simple google search, came up with several useful
pages about the
two together, none of which specified any problems. I
think you'r "problem"
is your "protege".
Is he a friend of Wong's?
Kat
"Barracuda Lips" <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com
wrote in message
news:2e7cd01c46af3$51e9a3c0$a301280a@phx.gbl...
Ok, then i guess no one can answer my question.
I guess the young lad is right, and therefore we need to
spend all night patching machines even though we have a
$100,000 SMS 2003 enterprise deployed by an over priced
consulting company.
Effing waste of $.
-----Original Message-----
NO sms here but I do have 2003 server with sus running
on
it.
Rick
"Consultant" <consultant_mcngp@yahoo.com> wrote in
message
news:uDhRiMqaEHA.1652@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
i believe that is a very bold statement and he should
be flogged
"Northen Pike Face"
anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:2e4b801c46aa1$7edd5590$a301280a@phx.gbl...
My protoge claims that no one on the planet is
using
SMS
2003/SUS combo method to do Windows Updates across
the
enterprise.
Can anyone here attest?
NPF
.
.
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
fygar
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Jul 16, 2004 12:30 pm Post subject: Re: SUS/SMS |
|
|
On Thu, 15 Jul 2004 14:41:24 -0700, "Pike Face"
<anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote:
| Quote: | Fygar lipps,
Please please describe how you have made this work.
I will send you amazon $ gift certs for meaty details, or
a big piece of meat.
Thx
|
Perhaps you could be more specific as to how you expect it to work.
Both pieces of software work well when using best practices, but I'm
not sure that one integrates into the other like it sounds like you're
expecting.
....butch() |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
Neil
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Jul 16, 2004 1:30 pm Post subject: Re: SUS/SMS |
|
|
"catwalker63" <_catwalker63_@hotmamamail.com> wrote in
news:OcyZNTwaEHA.2216@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl:
| Quote: | http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserversystem/sus/suschoosing.mspx
From the above link I am gathering they are independent and that sms
does
all that sus does and more.
|
www.susserver.com for the SUS information
--
Neil
Minutus cantorum, minutus balorum, minutus carborata descendum pantorum. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
