Micrasoft Supports Test Piracy
 




IT Certification FAQ

 
|
Home
|
Microsoft
|
CISCO
|
CompTIA
|
Exam/Study FAQ
|
Employment FAQ
| Links  | Forums  |
Book Reviews


FAQFAQ  SearchSearch  MemberlistMemberlist  UsergroupsUsergroups  RegisterRegister  ProfileProfile  Log in to check your private messagesPrivate messages  Log inLog in

Micrasoft Supports Test Piracy

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Forum Index -> microsoft.public.cert.exam.mcsd
Author Message
dz
Guest





PostPosted: Mon Sep 13, 2004 3:45 am    Post subject: Micrasoft Supports Test Piracy Reply with quote

New to the MCSE process but old to the Test Development Process, this is my
theory.

Microsoft states: "The Exam Development Process
To ensure the validity and reliability of our certification exams, Microsoft
adheres to a rigorous exam-development process, consisting of eight mandatory
phases: "

Phase 2: Objective Domain Definition
"The results of the job analysis provide the framework used to develop
objectives. "

Phase 3:
"The actual exam items are written according to the prioritized objectives."

Phase 4: Item Development
"A pool of items is developed to measure the blueprinted objective domain."

Now if these statements are true, how can non-obective based questions
appear on the exams?

I'd like to point directly at the 70-290 & 70-291 exams. Both of these
exams had numerous questions that did not pertain to the stated "objective
domain".

Is it possible that Microsoft is getting a kick-back from some of the
brain-dumpers or Test Pirates?

Is it ethical for Microsoft to publically state it's policies and then not
abid by them?

Is this possibly false and misleading actions?

Is this possibly FRAUD?

The following was sent to me by a CTEC owner;

"Never in our experience have we seen such a disconnect between the exams
(only 70-290 and 70-291) and the curriculum. For these two exams, our
teaching strategy had to change. We now try as best we can to prep the
students for the test; as opposed to concentrating on developing a skill set
that would enable a student to apply the most widely used aspects of MS
technologies in the real world."

"Make no mistake; Microsoft has had negative feedback from CTEC’s throughout
the country. I have spoken with MCT’s from all over who agree that there is a
problem. Microsoft is well aware of this condition."

" ... don’t spend another minute talking to Microsoft about this. You will
not receive an explanation from Microsoft; they will only waste your time. My
best advice is to let my months of effort to resolve these same issues
suffice. Advise your friends that these two exams will contain questions
outside of the scope of the objective domain. The continuance of that
unwritten policy will have the effect of increasing test revenue to Microsoft
and controlling the growth rate of MCSA’s. I think both of these effects are
desirable by Microsoft and that is why this problem persists."

I think that Microsoft is so wrapped around the axle trying to be the Test
Pirates that they are in fact pushing honest individuals that are trying to
learn and get certified to turn to the Pirates.

Oh and by the way, when I sent in a challege Michelle B. replied,

"The fact that a particular question appeared on the exam cannot be
challenged in itself."

This inspite of the fact that I can prove that the question was a 70-291
objective and it was on the 70-70-290 test and visa-versa.
Back to top
The Poster Formerly Known
Guest





PostPosted: Mon Sep 13, 2004 8:21 pm    Post subject: Re: Micrasoft Supports Test Piracy Reply with quote

Quote:
Microsoft states: "The Exam Development Process
To ensure the validity and reliability of our certification exams, Microsoft
adheres to a rigorous exam-development process, consisting of eight mandatory
phases: "

lol!

Quote:
Phase 2: Objective Domain Definition
"The results of the job analysis provide the framework used to develop
objectives. "

lol!

Quote:
Phase 3:
"The actual exam items are written according to the prioritized objectives."

Phase 4: Item Development
"A pool of items is developed to measure the blueprinted objective domain."

i.e. weed out the hard questions that the beta testers answered
incorrectly the most.

Quote:
Is it possible that Microsoft is getting a kick-back from some of the
brain-dumpers or Test Pirates?

someone will be knocking at your door real soon!

Quote:
Is it ethical for Microsoft to publically state it's policies and then not
abid by them?

they can say what the h*ll they want - they have more lawyers than
you!

Quote:
Is this possibly false and misleading actions?

maybe, maybe not.

Quote:
Is this possibly FRAUD?

what does your lawyer have to say on the subject?

Quote:
The following was sent to me by a CTEC owner;

"Never in our experience have we seen such a disconnect between the exams
(only 70-290 and 70-291) and the curriculum. For these two exams, our
teaching strategy had to change. We now try as best we can to prep the
students for the test; as opposed to concentrating on developing a skill set
that would enable a student to apply the most widely used aspects of MS
technologies in the real world."

"Make no mistake; Microsoft has had negative feedback from CTEC’s throughout
the country. I have spoken with MCT’s from all over who agree that there is a
problem. Microsoft is well aware of this condition."

yep, sounds about right.

Kline Sphere (Chalk) MCNGP #3
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Forum Index -> microsoft.public.cert.exam.mcsd All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 

Copyright © 2002-2006 Web-S-Sense Pty. Ltd. All rights reserved.

Powered by phpBB
Advertising | Policies/Disclaimers | Contact us | Link to us


Featured Sites: Free Antivirus and Antispyware Info | Free PC Support | MCSE Directory