|
|
 FAQ
 Search
 Memberlist
 Usergroups
 Register
 Profile
 Private messages
 Log in
|
|
| Author |
Message |
Guest
|
 Posted: Thu Dec 02, 2004 10:35 pm Post subject: 2 years? really? |
 |
|
I understand that MS recommends 2 years of experience
before taking exams? Is that really necessary or is that
a suggestion by MS that, in turn, gives employers some
sort of assurance that they are hiring someone with
knowledge AND experience?
Personally, I am beginning to study for the exams for
MCSD and I don't want to wait 2 years to take em. I have
5 years of development experience using other
technologies (LAMP platforms) but my current job is
100% .NET.
Any thoughts on this? For those that have taken the
exam, how much experience did you have when you took them?
Zach |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
Daniel Joskovski
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Dec 03, 2004 10:32 pm Post subject: Re: 2 years? really? |
|
|
Hi Zach,
Nobody says that you must wait two years to take an exam, that is only
recommendation deduced probably from surveys test takers do before or after
exam. But I can tell you that in my case I really have around two year
experience with the platform. I start working seriously with .NET somewhere
in 2002 and I became MCSD in October 2003 so I think the time frame is
correct.
Regards,
Daniel
<zkent@rjpetersassociates.com> wrote in message
news:0b0701c4d8b6$dccc98e0$a601280a@phx.gbl...
| Quote: | I understand that MS recommends 2 years of experience
before taking exams? Is that really necessary or is that
a suggestion by MS that, in turn, gives employers some
sort of assurance that they are hiring someone with
knowledge AND experience?
Personally, I am beginning to study for the exams for
MCSD and I don't want to wait 2 years to take em. I have
5 years of development experience using other
technologies (LAMP platforms) but my current job is
100% .NET.
Any thoughts on this? For those that have taken the
exam, how much experience did you have when you took them?
Zach |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Vipul Patel
Guest
|
| Posted: Sun Dec 05, 2004 11:34 pm Post subject: Re: 2 years? really? |
|
|
true, I think the surveys conducted by Microsoft would indicate that people
with around 2 years experience would fare better that people with lesser
experience. Hence the recommendation.
Regards
Vipul
"Daniel Joskovski" <omnis@NOSPAMunetREMOVECAPS.com.mk> wrote in message
news:eJufcMY2EHA.3840@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
| Quote: | Hi Zach,
Nobody says that you must wait two years to take an exam, that is only
recommendation deduced probably from surveys test takers do before or
after
exam. But I can tell you that in my case I really have around two year
experience with the platform. I start working seriously with .NET
somewhere
in 2002 and I became MCSD in October 2003 so I think the time frame is
correct.
Regards,
Daniel
zkent@rjpetersassociates.com> wrote in message
news:0b0701c4d8b6$dccc98e0$a601280a@phx.gbl...
I understand that MS recommends 2 years of experience
before taking exams? Is that really necessary or is that
a suggestion by MS that, in turn, gives employers some
sort of assurance that they are hiring someone with
knowledge AND experience?
Personally, I am beginning to study for the exams for
MCSD and I don't want to wait 2 years to take em. I have
5 years of development experience using other
technologies (LAMP platforms) but my current job is
100% .NET.
Any thoughts on this? For those that have taken the
exam, how much experience did you have when you took them?
Zach
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
