|
|
 FAQ
 Search
 Memberlist
 Usergroups
 Register
 Profile
 Private messages
 Log in
|
|
| Author |
Message |
dave fyock
Guest
|
 Posted: Wed Jul 30, 2003 2:52 am Post subject: ccna-microsoft |
 |
|
whoever said the ccna is comparable in difficulty to Microsoft tests must
have bumped their head! the ccna was the hardest test ever.
5 months study time with an hour a day on the simulator. used sybex, ccna
for dummies and surprisingly the thomson learning book was very good. i see
why the Cisco certs. are so prized. my hat's off to Cisco. pass 949 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
Chris Wong
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed Jul 30, 2003 6:27 am Post subject: Re: ccna-microsoft |
|
|
I agree. Cisco exams require one to be very *** with details. It's almost
like any minute detail will be on an exam; don't think anything you might go
over is not important...
--
Chris Wong
A+, Server+, Network+, Linux+,
CCNA, CCDA, CSE, MCSA, MCSE
"dave fyock" <dfyock@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:x0CVa.9246$Vt6.3278@rwcrnsc52.ops.asp.att.net...
| Quote: | whoever said the ccna is comparable in difficulty to Microsoft tests must
have bumped their head! the ccna was the hardest test ever.
5 months study time with an hour a day on the simulator. used sybex, ccna
for dummies and surprisingly the thomson learning book was very good. i
see
why the Cisco certs. are so prized. my hat's off to Cisco. pass 949
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
BOBO
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Aug 01, 2003 3:36 pm Post subject: Re: ccna-microsoft |
|
|
I don't think so.
Microsoft Questions are rather longer, less direct, with more trap. Many
questions have scenario to study and
request more real world experience.
On the other side, Cisco request more teoric preparation for CCNA.
So I think you could pass CCNA only with study, but If you try Microsoft
exam's without experience is hard to pass. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
