Rephrase: How to calculate the number of available subnets
 




IT Certification FAQ

 
|
Home
|
Microsoft
|
CISCO
|
CompTIA
|
Exam/Study FAQ
|
Employment FAQ
| Links  | Forums  |
Book Reviews


FAQFAQ  SearchSearch  MemberlistMemberlist  UsergroupsUsergroups  RegisterRegister  ProfileProfile  Log in to check your private messagesPrivate messages  Log inLog in

Rephrase: How to calculate the number of available subnets

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Forum Index -> alt.certification.cisco
Author Message
martin
Guest





PostPosted: Sat Aug 09, 2003 8:21 am    Post subject: Rephrase: How to calculate the number of available subnets Reply with quote

message unavailable
Back to top
martin
Guest





PostPosted: Sat Aug 09, 2003 8:21 am    Post subject: Rephrase: How to calculate the number of available subnets Reply with quote

That makes more sense. :)


"martin" <bajelisNO@SPAM4MEozemail.com.au> wrote in message
news:3f346839$0$23599$5a62ac22@freenews.iinet.net.au...
Quote:
"martin" <bajelisNO@SPAM4MEozemail.com.au> wrote in message
news:3f345f41$0$23595$5a62ac22@freenews.iinet.net.au...

Wendell Odom (In CCNA Certification guide 640-507) states:

" The number of subnets per network is defined by this formula:

2 ^ number of subnet bits

In some documents the number of subnets is shown as 2 less than 2^
number
of
subnet bits, implying two reserved cases. These two cases are no longer
reserverd, however and can be used."

Tod Lammle (In CCNA Study Guide 3rd Edition 640-607) states:

" How many subnets ? 2 ^x - 2 = number of subnets. x is the number of
masked
bits. "


So my quesiton is:

Which is correct FOR THE PURPOSES OF THE EXAM ???


Thanks,

Martin.

I wasn't concentrating:

The question is how to calculate the number of SUBNETS, not HOSTS.

Sorry... the question is correct, but my subject is wrong :)

Cheers,

Martin






Back to top
Steve Largess
Guest





PostPosted: Sun Aug 10, 2003 3:07 am    Post subject: Re: Rephrase: How to calculate the number of available subn Reply with quote

The OLD CCNA taught (2^n)-2 assuming you did not use subnet zero.
The new CCNA (based on ICND 2.0) assumes 2^n.
Found a handy subnet calc (free) that does both:

www.boson.com/eula.htm




On Sat, 9 Aug 2003 13:21:37 +1000, "martin"
<bajelisNO@SPAM4MEozemail.com.au> wrote:

Quote:

That makes more sense. :)


"martin" <bajelisNO@SPAM4MEozemail.com.au> wrote in message
news:3f346839$0$23599$5a62ac22@freenews.iinet.net.au...
"martin" <bajelisNO@SPAM4MEozemail.com.au> wrote in message
news:3f345f41$0$23595$5a62ac22@freenews.iinet.net.au...

Wendell Odom (In CCNA Certification guide 640-507) states:

" The number of subnets per network is defined by this formula:

2 ^ number of subnet bits

In some documents the number of subnets is shown as 2 less than 2^
number
of
subnet bits, implying two reserved cases. These two cases are no longer
reserverd, however and can be used."

Tod Lammle (In CCNA Study Guide 3rd Edition 640-607) states:

" How many subnets ? 2 ^x - 2 = number of subnets. x is the number of
masked
bits. "


So my quesiton is:

Which is correct FOR THE PURPOSES OF THE EXAM ???


Thanks,

Martin.

I wasn't concentrating:

The question is how to calculate the number of SUBNETS, not HOSTS.

Sorry... the question is correct, but my subject is wrong :)

Cheers,

Martin







Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Forum Index -> alt.certification.cisco All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 

Copyright © 2002-2006 Web-S-Sense Pty. Ltd. All rights reserved.

Powered by phpBB
Advertising | Policies/Disclaimers | Contact us | Link to us


Featured Sites: Free Antivirus and Antispyware Info | Free PC Support | MCSE Directory