|
|
 FAQ
 Search
 Memberlist
 Usergroups
 Register
 Profile
 Private messages
 Log in
|
|
| Author |
Message |
Andrew
Guest
|
 Posted: Mon Apr 24, 2006 6:14 am Post subject: ATTN: Design Engineers. Require 100 remote site VPN solution |
 |
|
Hello Design Engineers,
I need some help coming up with a solution for a 100 remote worker site
to site VPN.
Sure I could just statically connect them all to the hub site, but I
was hoping for a more scaleable solution.
Is there any way I could have the remote site address ranges allocated
by the Hub site? I.e. as they come online, the hub site allocates them
a /27 address space?
Is NAT the only way to achieve this?
Thanks in advanced. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
Walter Roberson
Guest
|
| Posted: Mon Apr 24, 2006 8:44 am Post subject: Re: ATTN: Design Engineers. Require 100 remote site VPN solu |
|
|
In article <1145844891.296753.29130@u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com>,
Andrew <andrew.obrien@integ.net.au> wrote:
| Quote: | I need some help coming up with a solution for a 100 remote worker site
to site VPN.
|
Your Subject: implies that you have 100 remote sites. The above sentance
implies that you have one remote site with ~100 hosts.
| Quote: | Sure I could just statically connect them all to the hub site, but I
was hoping for a more scaleable solution.
|
"Scaleable" isn't something one would normally consider if one is only
doing something once.
| Quote: | Is there any way I could have the remote site address ranges allocated
by the Hub site? I.e. as they come online, the hub site allocates them
a /27 address space?
|
That's sounding like you have multiple sites rather than one.
| Quote: | Is NAT the only way to achieve this?
|
I suggest you search for Merv's recent mention in this group of DMVPN and another
technology that I don't recall the name of. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
