|
|
| Author |
Message |
Viperman
Guest
|
 Posted: Sat Oct 11, 2003 2:18 am Post subject: Runtime errors |
 |
|
Every time I go on a web page I get a runtime error and it asks me if I
want to debug? What is happening and how do I fix it? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
The Pugmaster
Guest
|
| Posted: Sat Oct 11, 2003 5:36 am Post subject: Re: Runtime errors |
|
|
You are using IE 6 right?
The Pugmaster
"Viperman" <noway@nohow.com.au> wrote in message news:gvJhb.145734$bo1.118920@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
Every time I go on a web page I get a runtime error and it asks me if I
want to debug? What is happening and how do I fix it? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Geoff
Guest
|
| Posted: Sat Oct 11, 2003 12:36 pm Post subject: Re: Runtime errors |
|
|
Viperman wrote:
| Quote: | Every time I go on a web page I get a runtime error and it asks me
if I want to debug? What is happening and how do I fix it?
|
goto internet options > advanced and disable script debugging |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Viperman
Guest
|
| Posted: Sat Oct 11, 2003 11:15 pm Post subject: Re: Runtime errors |
|
|
Yes
"The Pugmaster" <thepugmaster@iamnotgivingittoyou.com> wrote in message
news:lpMhb.36$Ns6.193646@news.abs.net...
| Quote: | You are using IE 6 right?
The Pugmaster
"Viperman" <noway@nohow.com.au> wrote in message
news:gvJhb.145734$bo1.118920@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
Every time I go on a web page I get a runtime error and it asks me if I
want to debug? What is happening and how do I fix it?
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
The Pugmaster
Guest
|
| Posted: Sun Oct 12, 2003 12:46 am Post subject: Re: Runtime errors |
|
|
Viperman,
What is happening is the web pages that you are going to don't have their scrips in the pages done right, with the options that you
have set in IE, it is giving you info so that you can debug the script in the page. Its option 6 & 7 in the advanced internet
options. You may be able to uncheck the "Display a notification about every script error" so that IE would still debug the scripts.
The Pugmaster
"Viperman" <noway@nohow.com.au> wrote in message news:d%%hb.146777$bo1.55512@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
Yes
"The Pugmaster" <thepugmaster@iamnotgivingittoyou.com> wrote in message
news:lpMhb.36$Ns6.193646@news.abs.net...
| Quote: | You are using IE 6 right?
The Pugmaster
"Viperman" <noway@nohow.com.au> wrote in message
news:gvJhb.145734$bo1.118920@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
Every time I go on a web page I get a runtime error and it asks me if I
want to debug? What is happening and how do I fix it?
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
The Pugmaster
Guest
|
| Posted: Sun Oct 12, 2003 12:46 am Post subject: Re: Runtime errors |
|
|
Viperman,
What is happening is the web pages that you are going to don't have their scrips in the pages done right, with the options that you
have set in IE, it is giving you info so that you can debug the script in the page. Its option 6 & 7 in the advanced internet
options. You may be able to uncheck the "Display a notification about every script error" so that IE would still debug the scripts.
The Pugmaster
"Viperman" <noway@nohow.com.au> wrote in message news:d%%hb.146777$bo1.55512@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
Yes
"The Pugmaster" <thepugmaster@iamnotgivingittoyou.com> wrote in message
news:lpMhb.36$Ns6.193646@news.abs.net...
| Quote: | You are using IE 6 right?
The Pugmaster
"Viperman" <noway@nohow.com.au> wrote in message
news:gvJhb.145734$bo1.118920@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
Every time I go on a web page I get a runtime error and it asks me if I
want to debug? What is happening and how do I fix it?
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Kevin M
Guest
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 07, 2006 4:08 am Post subject: Re: Question about the old / new exams. |
|
|
"JesseRyan" <no@spam.invalid> wrote in message
news:12kjt6r9f3eqc9c@news.supernews.com...
| Quote: | I have passed my A+ Core Hardware exam and I am going for my A+ OS on
Monday but I was wondering if the 2006 exams come into affect between
then and now will that mean that I have to retake both ? If someone
could let me know that would be great. Thank you.
|
Don't sweat. The A+ exam is a joke. My 8 year old could probably pass it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
Michael A. Terrell
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu Nov 09, 2006 9:41 pm Post subject: Re: Question about the old / new exams. |
|
|
JohnO wrote:
| Quote: |
Michael A. Terrell wrote:
JohnO wrote:
Kevin M wrote:
Don't sweat. The A+ exam is a joke. My 8 year old could probably pass it.
That's nothing...my dog could pass it.
-John O
My dog could write the questions for your dog to take the test! ;-)
http://home.earthlink.net/~mike.terrell/photos.
One ShihTzu to another, works for me.
|
You could truthfully say, "That test was a DOG!" ;-)
--
Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I've got my DD214 to
prove it.
Member of DAV #85.
Michael A. Terrell
Central Florida |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
JohnO
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Nov 10, 2006 12:05 am Post subject: Re: Question about the old / new exams. |
|
|
| Quote: | Don't sweat. The A+ exam is a joke. My 8 year old could probably pass it.
That's nothing...my dog could pass it.
-John O
My dog could write the questions for your dog to take the test! ;-)
http://home.earthlink.net/~mike.terrell/photos.
One ShihTzu to another, works for me.
You could truthfully say, "That test was a DOG!" ;-)
|
In a late attempt to inject some seriousness...considering that we're
making fun of unintelligent little dogs who need haircuts....the 2003
exams can be passed with a minimum of skill and a strong dose of
multiple-choice acumen. The 2006 exams are a lot better, a lot harder
if you want to look at it that way. The questions are better, there are
more hard ones that make sense than before. But good luck on some of
the customer service questions, they don't have a singe good answer.
I have ample evidence (400+ tech school students over six years) that
these exams were never fail-proof. 75% is the pass rate I've seen, and
many of the students that fail have solid hands-on skills. The bottom
line is that the exams do what they are intended to do, when they are
used by the intended audience.
-John O |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Patty
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Nov 10, 2006 4:16 am Post subject: Re: Question about the old / new exams. |
|
|
On 9 Nov 2006 10:05:43 -0800, JohnO wrote:
| Quote: | In a late attempt to inject some seriousness...considering that we're
making fun of unintelligent little dogs who need haircuts....the 2003
exams can be passed with a minimum of skill and a strong dose of
multiple-choice acumen. The 2006 exams are a lot better, a lot harder
if you want to look at it that way. The questions are better, there are
more hard ones that make sense than before. But good luck on some of
the customer service questions, they don't have a singe good answer.
I have ample evidence (400+ tech school students over six years) that
these exams were never fail-proof. 75% is the pass rate I've seen, and
many of the students that fail have solid hands-on skills. The bottom
line is that the exams do what they are intended to do, when they are
used by the intended audience.
-John O
|
Wondering how my cats would do on the test? ;)
Kidding aside, I've never been very good at taking multiple guess tests. I
hate them. I'd almost rather have an essay test where I can write down
what I know rather than guessing the right answer from a list of choices.
So, I guess I've always had to depend on really knowing the stuff, since
I'm terrible at guessing.
Patty |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Glenn
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Nov 10, 2006 8:32 pm Post subject: Re: Question about the old / new exams. |
|
|
I passed my A+ in 1994 with no study. There was only one test then and
it had all kinds of questions including Mac. It had just comeout and my
boss wanted to see how someone would do with no study (i did have 40
years computer experience).
Patty wrote:
| Quote: | On 9 Nov 2006 10:05:43 -0800, JohnO wrote:
In a late attempt to inject some seriousness...considering that we're
making fun of unintelligent little dogs who need haircuts....the 2003
exams can be passed with a minimum of skill and a strong dose of
multiple-choice acumen. The 2006 exams are a lot better, a lot harder
if you want to look at it that way. The questions are better, there are
more hard ones that make sense than before. But good luck on some of
the customer service questions, they don't have a singe good answer.
I have ample evidence (400+ tech school students over six years) that
these exams were never fail-proof. 75% is the pass rate I've seen, and
many of the students that fail have solid hands-on skills. The bottom
line is that the exams do what they are intended to do, when they are
used by the intended audience.
-John O
Wondering how my cats would do on the test? ;)
Kidding aside, I've never been very good at taking multiple guess tests. I
hate them. I'd almost rather have an essay test where I can write down
what I know rather than guessing the right answer from a list of choices.
So, I guess I've always had to depend on really knowing the stuff, since
I'm terrible at guessing.
Patty |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
JohnO
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Nov 10, 2006 10:14 pm Post subject: Re: Question about the old / new exams. |
|
|
Glenn wrote:
| Quote: | I passed my A+ in 1994 with no study. There was only one test then and
it had all kinds of questions including Mac. It had just comeout and my
boss wanted to see how someone would do with no study (i did have 40
years computer experience).
|
Same here about 1994. There was only one "A+" study tool at the time, a
package of books by IBM...it included one on IBM DOS, not MS-DOS. The
main book about the exam was pretty bad. But you know, because I went
in cold, that exam tested my actual skill level like no other since.
Do you still have the plastic A+ card? ;-)
-John O |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Private messages
Log in
