|
|
 FAQ
 Search
 Memberlist
 Usergroups
 Register
 Profile
 Private messages
 Log in
|
|
| Author |
Message |
Computer Guru
Guest
|
 Posted: Wed Jul 04, 2007 7:02 am Post subject: Is 100k Handles too Much? |
 |
|
My Windows Server 2003 SP2 server (IIS 6, MySQL, Tomcat, PostgreSQL,
PHP via FastCGI) runs at a constant 90k-105k handles. The Limit is set
at 2492408.
I think there is something wrong since that's an insanely high count -
but the server remains fast and stable, so I'm not sure.
It's an x86, with 1GB of RAM (generally around 3/4ths is used).
Is there something wrong or is this perfectly OK? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
Computer Guru
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed Jul 04, 2007 7:02 am Post subject: Re: Is 100k Handles too Much? |
|
|
On Jul 4, 8:17 am, Computer Guru <mqu...@gmail.com> wrote:
| Quote: | My Windows Server 2003 SP2 server (IIS 6, MySQL, Tomcat, PostgreSQL,
PHP via FastCGI) runs at a constant 90k-105k handles. The Limit is set
at 2492408.
I think there is something wrong since that's an insanely high count -
but the server remains fast and stable, so I'm not sure.
It's an x86, with 1GB of RAM (generally around 3/4ths is used).
Is there something wrong or is this perfectly OK?
|
Please ignore that sentence about the limit. I was looking in the
wrong place - that's for the "commit charge" |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
