PIX 525 (v7) with Gb interfaces
 




IT Certification FAQ

 
|
Home
|
Microsoft
|
CISCO
|
CompTIA
|
Exam/Study FAQ
|
Employment FAQ
| Links  | Forums  |
Book Reviews


FAQFAQ  SearchSearch  MemberlistMemberlist  UsergroupsUsergroups  RegisterRegister  ProfileProfile  Log in to check your private messagesPrivate messages  Log inLog in

PIX 525 (v7) with Gb interfaces

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Forum Index -> comp.dcom.sys.cisco
Author Message
Arthur Brain
Guest





PostPosted: Wed Aug 22, 2007 9:44 am    Post subject: PIX 525 (v7) with Gb interfaces Reply with quote

Is there any point?

Any idea what kind of throughput the PIX itself will support if I put
a couple of Gb interfaces in it?
Back to top
Trendkill
Guest





PostPosted: Wed Aug 22, 2007 3:39 pm    Post subject: Re: PIX 525 (v7) with Gb interfaces Reply with quote

On Aug 22, 12:44 am, Arthur Brain <arthur_bra...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
Quote:
Is there any point?

Any idea what kind of throughput the PIX itself will support if I put
a couple of Gb interfaces in it?

Generally speaking, firewalls are governed by sessions and everything
depends on what kind of services you are running on it. This is taken
from Cisco's 525 site:

"The Cisco PIX 525 modular two-rack-unit design supports up to eight
10/100 Fast Ethernet interfaces or three Gigabit Ethernet interfaces,
making it an ideal appliance for businesses that need a resilient,
high-performance, Gigabit Ethernet-ready solution that provides solid
investment protection. It also delivers more than 330 Mbps of firewall
throughput with the capability to handle more than 280,000
simultaneous sessions."

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/vpndevc/ps2030/ps2118/index.html

So to answer your question, it most likely depends on sessions more
than anything, and the above statement says something about 330 mbps
of firewall throughput which I'm sure is generic or simple
configurations. Since its limited to 3 interfaces, I would not
suspect that it can handle a ton of bandwidth, but it most likely
depends on a bunch of other factors. The organization I work for
recently went to checkpoint on crossbeam hardware due to their
significantly better performance in terms of sessions. While the
hardware was rated the same between the old platform and the new, the
crossbeams gave us significantly better performance in terms of same
sessions with much less processor (<50% versus <80% I believe).
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Forum Index -> comp.dcom.sys.cisco All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 

Copyright © 2002-2006 Web-S-Sense Pty. Ltd. All rights reserved.

Powered by phpBB
Advertising | Policies/Disclaimers | Contact us | Link to us


Featured Sites: Free Antivirus and Antispyware Info | Free PC Support | MCSE Directory