odd BGP Problem
 




IT Certification FAQ

 
|
Home
|
Microsoft
|
CISCO
|
CompTIA
|
Exam/Study FAQ
|
Employment FAQ
| Links  | Forums  |
Book Reviews


FAQFAQ  SearchSearch  MemberlistMemberlist  UsergroupsUsergroups  RegisterRegister  ProfileProfile  Log in to check your private messagesPrivate messages  Log inLog in

odd BGP Problem

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Forum Index -> comp.dcom.sys.cisco
Author Message
Gary
Guest





PostPosted: Wed Feb 20, 2008 7:11 am    Post subject: odd BGP Problem Reply with quote

We have a router connected to 2 x tier1 provider routers over a single
x-connect and we run BGP to them no problems. We have taken on a new client
that wants their own dedicated cable and BGP session to the same 2 routers
and a second x-connect is now in and 2 new BGP sessions are up to what are
actually the same tier1 routers.

The client wants his address space routed over his cable to the tier1
provider unless that cable fails in which case the traffic should failover
to our x-connect to the tier1 provider.

The question is how do I get the customers traffic to ONLY leave via his
x-connect cable/BGP sessions while it is up but failover to ours if his
fails. Also how do I get the inbound traffic to ONLY come down one set of
BGP sessions (the clients) as opposed to our BGP sessions while his are up.

An ASCI Diagram would look like


Our Router A x------------our x-connect------------------------x Tier1
Router A & B - This carries to BGP sessions on a small subnet which we use
for clients to transit generally
Our Router A x------------client x-connect----------------------x Tier 1
Router A & B- This should only carry client subnet in and out while up
otherwise failover to our cable and BGP sessions

Both cables carry 2 BGP peering sessions receivong full routing tables with
both Tier1 Router A and B so in total we now gave 4 full routing tables form
the same Tier1 provider on Our Router A.


Hope this makes sense.
Thanks
Gary
Back to top
Barry Margolin
Guest





PostPosted: Wed Feb 20, 2008 10:51 am    Post subject: Re: odd BGP Problem Reply with quote

In article <%6Luj.3489$0M3.833@newsfe17.lga>,
"Gary" <gshine@netlink.info> wrote:

Quote:
We have a router connected to 2 x tier1 provider routers over a single
x-connect and we run BGP to them no problems. We have taken on a new client
that wants their own dedicated cable and BGP session to the same 2 routers
and a second x-connect is now in and 2 new BGP sessions are up to what are
actually the same tier1 routers.

The client wants his address space routed over his cable to the tier1
provider unless that cable fails in which case the traffic should failover
to our x-connect to the tier1 provider.

The question is how do I get the customers traffic to ONLY leave via his
x-connect cable/BGP sessions while it is up but failover to ours if his
fails. Also how do I get the inbound traffic to ONLY come down one set of
BGP sessions (the clients) as opposed to our BGP sessions while his are up.

This should happen automatically. The routes through your x-connect
should have your ASN in the AS path, which will make it longer than the
routes directly to the tier1 providers.

Quote:

An ASCI Diagram would look like


Our Router A x------------our x-connect------------------------x Tier1
Router A & B - This carries to BGP sessions on a small subnet which we use
for clients to transit generally
Our Router A x------------client x-connect----------------------x Tier 1
Router A & B- This should only carry client subnet in and out while up
otherwise failover to our cable and BGP sessions

Both cables carry 2 BGP peering sessions receivong full routing tables with
both Tier1 Router A and B so in total we now gave 4 full routing tables form
the same Tier1 provider on Our Router A.


Hope this makes sense.
Thanks
Gary

--
Barry Margolin, barmar@alum.mit.edu
Arlington, MA
*** PLEASE post questions in newsgroups, not directly to me ***
*** PLEASE don't copy me on replies, I'll read them in the group ***
Back to top
Yandy Ramirez
Guest





PostPosted: Wed Feb 20, 2008 11:09 am    Post subject: Re: odd BGP Problem Reply with quote

Well having the customer with a separate x-connect and bgp sessions directly
to the Transit providers should automatically have a shorter as-path from
cust-to-provider. But the customer can set a higher local-pref on the routes
received from those two neighbors and a lower local-pref to the prefixes
received from you.

Now controlling inbound traffic is a bit trickier you can try AS-PREPEND
(even though technically it should route automatically to his direct
connection) but that's beyond your control as the providers can set
LOCAL-PREF on their side and their goes that idea. So what you can really do
is.

1) BGP conditional advertisement (where you track a certain prefix) maybe a
loopback on the customer routers (2 in this case) and only advertise the
customers prefixes to the providers through your link if and only if both
loopbacks go down. That way the provider will really only see the customers
prefixes through their link unless it goes down, then you start advertising
The customers prefixes through your connection.

cya


On 2/19/08 11:51 PM, in article
barmar-D1A4BA.23512119022008@comcast.dca.giganews.com, "Barry Margolin"
<barmar@alum.mit.edu> wrote:

Quote:
In article <%6Luj.3489$0M3.833@newsfe17.lga>,
"Gary" <gshine@netlink.info> wrote:

We have a router connected to 2 x tier1 provider routers over a single
x-connect and we run BGP to them no problems. We have taken on a new client
that wants their own dedicated cable and BGP session to the same 2 routers
and a second x-connect is now in and 2 new BGP sessions are up to what are
actually the same tier1 routers.

The client wants his address space routed over his cable to the tier1
provider unless that cable fails in which case the traffic should failover
to our x-connect to the tier1 provider.

The question is how do I get the customers traffic to ONLY leave via his
x-connect cable/BGP sessions while it is up but failover to ours if his
fails. Also how do I get the inbound traffic to ONLY come down one set of
BGP sessions (the clients) as opposed to our BGP sessions while his are up.

This should happen automatically. The routes through your x-connect
should have your ASN in the AS path, which will make it longer than the
routes directly to the tier1 providers.


An ASCI Diagram would look like


Our Router A x------------our x-connect------------------------x Tier1
Router A & B - This carries to BGP sessions on a small subnet which we use
for clients to transit generally
Our Router A x------------client x-connect----------------------x Tier 1
Router A & B- This should only carry client subnet in and out while up
otherwise failover to our cable and BGP sessions

Both cables carry 2 BGP peering sessions receivong full routing tables with
both Tier1 Router A and B so in total we now gave 4 full routing tables form
the same Tier1 provider on Our Router A.


Hope this makes sense.
Thanks
Gary
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Forum Index -> comp.dcom.sys.cisco All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 

Copyright © 2002-2006 Web-S-Sense Pty. Ltd. All rights reserved.

Powered by phpBB
Advertising | Policies/Disclaimers | Contact us | Link to us


Featured Sites: Free Antivirus and Antispyware Info | Free PC Support | MCSE Directory