|
|
| Author |
Message |
JaR Guest
|
Posted: Wed Feb 20, 2008 10:17 pm Post subject: A nearly On-Topic question |
|
|
No, seriously ;-)
I'm trying to write a Group Policy to allow certain ActiveX controls to
load on machines without local admin privileges. This is what I've come
up with, but for some reason it won't work. Anyone out there ever done
this before? What have I done wrong?
************************************************************
CLASS USER
CATEGORY "Windows Components"
CATEGORY "Internet Explorer"
CATEGORY "Administrator Approved Controls"
KEYNAME
"Software\Policies\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Internet
Settings\AllowedControls"
POLICY "Allowed ActiveX"
EXPLAIN "Allows specific ActiveX to run"
PART "Promax Logon" CHECKBOX
VALUENAME {ED5BE7F4-9C97-4013-8838-48C20128D73A}
VALUEON NUMERIC 0
VALUEOFF NUMERIC 1
END PART
END POLICY
END CATEGORY ;; AdminApproved
END CATEGORY ;; Internet Explorer
END CATEGORY ;; WindowsComponents
****************************************************************
Valuename is the ID # from the control in the downloaded program files,
and the policy shows up, and is enabled in the GPO snap-in.
--
JaR
Scratching head in confusion, as usual
Remove hat to reply |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
Michael D. Alligood [Cert Guest
|
Posted: Sat Feb 23, 2008 1:29 am Post subject: Re: A nearly On-Topic question |
|
|
"JaR" <jrderby@lakabux.com> wrote in message
news:elvpEbadIHA.484@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl:
| Quote: | On 2/22/2008,CBIC had the unmitigated gall to claim:
"kpg*" <no@spam.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9A4C90087BC43ipostthereforeiam@207.46.248.16...
hmmmm... seems Vista solves all your problems.
Someone should punch you in the mouth for typing that.
Hard and repeatedly!
--
JaR
Teach 'im ta agree with *me*
Remove hat to reply
|
And what's so wrong with Vista.
<arsewhippin>
--
Michael D. Alligood, MCITP, MCTS, MCSA, MCDST
The I.T. Classroom - http://www.theitclassroom.com/
CertGuard, Inc. - http://www.certguard.com/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kpg* Guest
|
Posted: Sat Feb 23, 2008 1:29 am Post subject: Re: A nearly On-Topic question |
|
|
"JaR" <jrderby@lakabux.com> wrote in news:OtCRPMZdIHA.5348
@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl:
| Quote: | I know it's prolly something stupid I'm doing.
|
I could not agree more. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
JaR Guest
|
Posted: Sat Feb 23, 2008 1:29 am Post subject: Re: A nearly On-Topic question |
|
|
On 2/22/2008,CBIC had the unmitigated gall to claim:
| Quote: |
"kpg*" <no@spam.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9A4C8F06CCFFCipostthereforeiam@207.46.248.16...
anyway...based on this I say you're doing it right.
...so there really is no problem.
Your welcome.
I agree. If the script doesn't meet your requirement, then change
your requirement and take the rest of the day off.
|
First intelligent thing I've heard all fscking day.
--
JaR
Make it so, Number One!
Remove hat to reply |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
JaR Guest
|
Posted: Sat Feb 23, 2008 1:29 am Post subject: Re: A nearly On-Topic question |
|
|
On 2/22/2008,kpg* had the unmitigated gall to claim:
| Quote: | "JaR" <jrderby@lakabux.com> wrote in news:OtCRPMZdIHA.5348
@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl:
I know it's prolly something stupid I'm doing.
I could not agree more.
|
Thanks. uh...I mean...hey!
--
JaR
Same to you
Remove hat to reply |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
JaR Guest
|
Posted: Sat Feb 23, 2008 1:29 am Post subject: Re: A nearly On-Topic question |
|
|
On 2/22/2008,CBIC had the unmitigated gall to claim:
| Quote: |
"kpg*" <no@spam.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9A4C90087BC43ipostthereforeiam@207.46.248.16...
hmmmm... seems Vista solves all your problems.
Someone should punch you in the mouth for typing that.
|
Hard and repeatedly!
--
JaR
Teach 'im ta agree with *me*
Remove hat to reply |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kpg* Guest
|
Posted: Sat Feb 23, 2008 1:29 am Post subject: Re: A nearly On-Topic question |
|
|
"CBIC" <spam.thisbiotch@gmail.com> wrote in news:#cg1RrZdIHA.4312
@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl:
| Quote: |
"kpg*" <no@spam.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9A4C8F06CCFFCipostthereforeiam@207.46.248.16...
anyway...based on this I say you're doing it right.
...so there really is no problem.
Your welcome.
I agree. If the script doesn't meet your requirement, then change your
requirement and take the rest of the day off.
|
There is no spoon. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
|