A nearly On-Topic question
 




IT Certification FAQ

 
|
Home
|
Microsoft
|
CISCO
|
CompTIA
|
Exam/Study FAQ
|
Employment FAQ
| Links  | Forums  |
Book Reviews


FAQFAQ  SearchSearch  MemberlistMemberlist  UsergroupsUsergroups  RegisterRegister  ProfileProfile  Log in to check your private messagesPrivate messages  Log inLog in

A nearly On-Topic question

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Forum Index -> microsoft.public.cert.exam.mcse
Author Message
JaR
Guest





PostPosted: Wed Feb 20, 2008 10:17 pm    Post subject: A nearly On-Topic question Reply with quote

No, seriously ;-)

I'm trying to write a Group Policy to allow certain ActiveX controls to
load on machines without local admin privileges. This is what I've come
up with, but for some reason it won't work. Anyone out there ever done
this before? What have I done wrong?


************************************************************
CLASS USER
CATEGORY "Windows Components"
CATEGORY "Internet Explorer"
CATEGORY "Administrator Approved Controls"
KEYNAME
"Software\Policies\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Internet
Settings\AllowedControls"


POLICY "Allowed ActiveX"
EXPLAIN "Allows specific ActiveX to run"
PART "Promax Logon" CHECKBOX
VALUENAME {ED5BE7F4-9C97-4013-8838-48C20128D73A}
VALUEON NUMERIC 0
VALUEOFF NUMERIC 1
END PART
END POLICY


END CATEGORY ;; AdminApproved
END CATEGORY ;; Internet Explorer
END CATEGORY ;; WindowsComponents

****************************************************************

Valuename is the ID # from the control in the downloaded program files,
and the policy shows up, and is enabled in the GPO snap-in.

--
JaR
Scratching head in confusion, as usual
Remove hat to reply
Back to top
Michael D. Alligood [Cert
Guest





PostPosted: Sat Feb 23, 2008 1:29 am    Post subject: Re: A nearly On-Topic question Reply with quote

"JaR" <jrderby@lakabux.com> wrote in message
news:elvpEbadIHA.484@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl:

Quote:
On 2/22/2008,CBIC had the unmitigated gall to claim:


"kpg*" <no@spam.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9A4C90087BC43ipostthereforeiam@207.46.248.16...
hmmmm... seems Vista solves all your problems.


Someone should punch you in the mouth for typing that.

Hard and repeatedly!

--
JaR
Teach 'im ta agree with *me*
Remove hat to reply

And what's so wrong with Vista.

<arsewhippin>

--
Michael D. Alligood, MCITP, MCTS, MCSA, MCDST
The I.T. Classroom - http://www.theitclassroom.com/
CertGuard, Inc. - http://www.certguard.com/
Back to top
kpg*
Guest





PostPosted: Sat Feb 23, 2008 1:29 am    Post subject: Re: A nearly On-Topic question Reply with quote

"JaR" <jrderby@lakabux.com> wrote in news:OtCRPMZdIHA.5348
@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl:

Quote:
I know it's prolly something stupid I'm doing.

I could not agree more.
Back to top
JaR
Guest





PostPosted: Sat Feb 23, 2008 1:29 am    Post subject: Re: A nearly On-Topic question Reply with quote

On 2/22/2008,CBIC had the unmitigated gall to claim:

Quote:

"kpg*" <no@spam.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9A4C8F06CCFFCipostthereforeiam@207.46.248.16...


anyway...based on this I say you're doing it right.

...so there really is no problem.

Your welcome.


I agree. If the script doesn't meet your requirement, then change
your requirement and take the rest of the day off.

First intelligent thing I've heard all fscking day.

--
JaR
Make it so, Number One!
Remove hat to reply
Back to top
JaR
Guest





PostPosted: Sat Feb 23, 2008 1:29 am    Post subject: Re: A nearly On-Topic question Reply with quote

On 2/22/2008,kpg* had the unmitigated gall to claim:

Quote:
"JaR" <jrderby@lakabux.com> wrote in news:OtCRPMZdIHA.5348
@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl:

I know it's prolly something stupid I'm doing.

I could not agree more.

Thanks. uh...I mean...hey!

--
JaR
Same to you
Remove hat to reply
Back to top
JaR
Guest





PostPosted: Sat Feb 23, 2008 1:29 am    Post subject: Re: A nearly On-Topic question Reply with quote

On 2/22/2008,CBIC had the unmitigated gall to claim:

Quote:

"kpg*" <no@spam.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9A4C90087BC43ipostthereforeiam@207.46.248.16...
hmmmm... seems Vista solves all your problems.


Someone should punch you in the mouth for typing that.

Hard and repeatedly!

--
JaR
Teach 'im ta agree with *me*
Remove hat to reply
Back to top
kpg*
Guest





PostPosted: Sat Feb 23, 2008 1:29 am    Post subject: Re: A nearly On-Topic question Reply with quote

"CBIC" <spam.thisbiotch@gmail.com> wrote in news:#cg1RrZdIHA.4312
@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl:

Quote:

"kpg*" <no@spam.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9A4C8F06CCFFCipostthereforeiam@207.46.248.16...


anyway...based on this I say you're doing it right.

...so there really is no problem.

Your welcome.


I agree. If the script doesn't meet your requirement, then change your
requirement and take the rest of the day off.



There is no spoon.
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Forum Index -> microsoft.public.cert.exam.mcse All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 

Copyright © 2002-2006 Web-S-Sense Pty. Ltd. All rights reserved.

Powered by phpBB
Advertising | Policies/Disclaimers | Contact us | Link to us


Featured Sites: Free Antivirus and Antispyware Info | Free PC Support | MCSE Directory